நீதிமன்றமும் வழக்கும்

LEGAL NOTICE

BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT DUE / SPEED POST / EMAIL Date: To, Subject: Sir/Madam, Under instructions from and on behalf of my client , residing at (hereinafter "my Client"), I hereby serve upon you the following legal notice: 1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2. YOUR DEFAULT 2.1 In the circumstances stated above, you have committed the following breach and default: 2.2 Your conduct constitutes a breach of your legal obligations towards my Client and has caused my Client loss, injury and prejudice. 2.3 Despite my Client's efforts to resolve this amicably, you have failed and neglected to remedy the position, leaving my Client with no option but to issue this notice. 3. DEMAND You are hereby called upon to do the following within days of receipt of this notice: 4. CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE 4.1 TAKE NOTICE that if you fail to comply with the above demand within the stipulated period, my Client shall be constrained to initiate appropriate civil and/or criminal proceedings against you before the competent court or forum, entirely at your risk, cost and consequence. 4.2 In such…

VAKALATNAMA

I, , residing at , do hereby appoint and authorize (Enrollment No. ) to appear, act, and plead on my behalf in the matter described below, before the concerned court and any authority connected with it. CASE DETAILS I authorize the said Advocate to file pleadings, applications, appeals, and other documents, to receive notices and orders, to withdraw or compromise the case, and to do all other acts necessary for the proper conduct of the case, on my behalf. I hereby ratify and confirm all acts done by the said Advocate in pursuance of this authority. Executed on . CLIENT ACCEPTED

எழுத்துப்பூர்வ அறிக்கை (சிவில் பதில்)

SUIT NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... PLAINTIFF VERSUS ... DEFENDANT WRITTEN STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT UNDER ORDER VIII OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Any preliminary objections set out above are taken without prejudice to one another and to the reply on merits set out below. PARAGRAPH-WISE REPLY The Defendant deals with the averments in the plaint as follows. Save as expressly and specifically admitted herein, EVERY averment, allegation and contention in the plaint is DENIED as if the same were set out and traversed seriatim. THE DEFENDANT'S VERSION OF THE FACTS ADDITIONAL PLEAS 1. That the Defendant has at all material times acted lawfully, in good faith, and in accordance with the obligations, if any, owed to the Plaintiff. 2. That the reliefs claimed by the Plaintiff are misconceived and not sustainable in law. 3. That the Defendant craves leave of this Hon'ble Court to raise such further and other pleas as may be advised at the time of hearing. COUNTER-CLAIM PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this…

ஜாமீன் மனு

BAIL APPLICATION NO. OF 20 IN FIR No. Police Station: Under Sections: IN THE MATTER OF: Relationship: Father's / husband's name: Residing at: ... APPLICANT / ACCUSED VERSUS STATE OF ... RESPONDENT APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF BAIL UNDER THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Applicant resides at the address stated above. 2. That the Applicant was arrested and taken into custody in connection with FIR No. registered at Police Station for offences under . Date of arrest / custody: 3. FACTS OF THE PROSECUTION CASE 4. GROUNDS FOR BAIL The Applicant seeks bail on the following grounds: 5. FURTHER GROUNDS 5.1 That the allegations against the Applicant are yet to be tested at trial, and the Applicant is presumed to be innocent unless proved guilty. 5.2 Criminal antecedents of the Applicant (previous convictions and other pending cases, if any): 5.3 That the continued detention of the Applicant is not necessary for the purposes of the investigation, and custodial interrogation of the Applicant is not required. 5.4 That the Applicant has roots in…

எச்சரிக்கை மனு

CAVEAT PETITION NO. OF 20 IN THE MATTER OF: ... CAVEATOR VERSUS ... EXPECTED APPLICANT CAVEAT UNDER SECTION 148A OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Caveator apprehends that the above-named Expected Applicant is likely to institute a suit, appeal, application or other proceeding before this Hon'ble Court in respect of the subject matter described below, and to seek interim orders therein. 2. SUBJECT MATTER OF THE ANTICIPATED PROCEEDING 3. GROUNDS OF APPREHENSION 4. That the Caveator has a direct and substantial interest in the subject matter of the anticipated proceeding, and would be adversely affected by any interim order passed without hearing the Caveator. 5. That the Caveator is a necessary and proper party to any such proceeding, and is entitled to be heard before any order is made against the Caveator's interest. 6. That Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 entitles a person claiming a right to appear before the Court on the hearing of an application expected to be made, to lodge a caveat; and where a caveat has been…

LEGAL NOTICE UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE NEGO…

BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT DUE / SPEED POST Date: To, Sir/Madam, Under instructions from and on behalf of my client , residing at (hereinafter "my Client"), I serve upon you the following notice: 1. THE LIABILITY 1.1 You are legally liable to my Client in respect of the following: 1.2 The said liability is a legally enforceable debt within the meaning of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 2. THE CHEQUE 2.1 In discharge of the said liability, you issued to my Client Cheque No. dated for Rs. (Rupees only), drawn on . 2.2 You issued the said cheque with full knowledge of your liability and with the representation that it would be honoured on presentation. 3. DISHONOUR 3.1 My Client presented the said cheque for encashment on within the period of its validity. 3.2 The said cheque was returned unpaid by the bank vide its return memo dated , with the reason recorded as "". 3.3 The dishonour of the said cheque, followed by your failure to pay the amount of the cheque within fifteen days of receipt of this notice, will constitute an offence punishable under…

நிறைவேற்றும் மனு

EXECUTION PETITION NO. OF 20 IN SUIT/CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... DECREE HOLDER VERSUS ... JUDGMENT DEBTOR PETITION UNDER SECTION 51 READ WITH ORDER XXI OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 FOR EXECUTION OF DECREE MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. PARTICULARS UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 11(2) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 (a) Number of the suit: (b) Names of the parties: (Decree Holder) versus (Judgment Debtor) (c) Date of the decree: (d) Whether any appeal has been preferred from the decree, and any stay: (e) Payment or other adjustment made between the parties after the decree, if any: (f) Previous applications for execution of the decree, with their dates and results: (g) Amount due upon the decree: Rs. Interest due, if any: Particulars of any cross-decree: (h) Costs awarded, if any: Rs. (i) Person against whom execution is sought: (j) Mode in which the assistance of the Court is required: as stated in paragraph 4 below. 2. THE DECREE 2.1 A decree dated was passed in Suit/Case No. in favour of the Decree Holder and against the Judgment Debtor. A certified copy of the decree is…

இடைக்கால தடை உத்தரவு விண்ணப்பம்

I.A. NO. OF 20 IN SUIT NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... PLAINTIFF / APPLICANT VERSUS ... DEFENDANT / RESPONDENT APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, FOR GRANT OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. NATURE OF THE DISPUTE 2. That the Applicant has filed the accompanying suit against the Respondent, and the contents of the plaint may kindly be read as part and parcel of this application and are not repeated here for the sake of brevity. 3. PRIMA FACIE CASE 3.1 The Applicant has a strong prima facie case on the merits, as follows: 3.2 There is a serious question to be tried in the suit, and the Applicant is likely to succeed at trial. 4. IRREPARABLE INJURY 4.1 If the injunction sought is not granted, the Applicant will suffer irreparable loss and injury, in the following manner: 4.2 The injury apprehended is such as cannot be adequately compensated in money, and the Applicant has no other equally efficacious remedy. 5. BALANCE OF CONVENIENCE The balance of convenience lies wholly in favour of the Applicant and…

சேவைக்கான பிரமாணப் பத்திரம்

Case No.: AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, , residing at , do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as follows: 1. That I duly served on . 2. That the said service was effected as follows (date, mode and result of service): 3. That I effected the said service myself, and the facts stated above are within my personal knowledge. 4. That the contents of this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and nothing material has been concealed. DEPONENT VERIFICATION Verified at on that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 4 of the above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and belief, and no part of it is false. DEPONENT IDENTIFIED BY ME SWORN AND SIGNED BEFORE ME Advocate Notary Public / Oath Commissioner Regn. No.: Seal:

சான்றளிக்கப்பட்ட நகலுக்கான விண்ணப்பம்

Case No. APPLICATION FOR CERTIFIED COPY Applicant: Respectfully submitted: 1. That the Applicant requires a certified copy of in the above matter, for use in further proceedings. 2. That the Applicant undertakes to pay the prescribed copying fees. PRAYER It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct that a certified copy of be issued to the Applicant. APPLICANT Date:

சட்டபூர்வமான கருத்துக் கோரிக்கை கடிதம்

Subject: Request for legal opinion Dear , I am writing to request your written legal opinion on the following matter: SPECIFIC QUESTIONS Please let me know your fee for this opinion and the expected turnaround time. I look forward to your response. Date:

ஒரு ஏழை நபராக வழக்குத் தொடர விண்ணப்பம் (நீ…

APPLICATION NO. OF 20 IN THE MATTER OF: residing at ... APPLICANT / PROPOSED PLAINTIFF VERSUS ... OPPOSITE PARTY / PROPOSED DEFENDANT APPLICATION UNDER ORDER XXXIII OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 FOR PERMISSION TO SUE AS AN INDIGENT PERSON MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Applicant intends to institute a suit against the Opposite Party before this Hon'ble Court and seeks permission to sue as an indigent person under Order XXXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The particulars required in a plaint are set out in paragraphs 2 to 5 below. 2. FACTS AND CAUSE OF ACTION 3. JURISDICTION 4. RELIEF TO BE CLAIMED IN THE SUIT 5. VALUATION AND COURT FEE Value of the suit for the purposes of jurisdiction and court fee: Rs. Court fee payable on the plaint: Rs. 6. MEANS OF THE APPLICANT That the Applicant is not possessed of sufficient means, other than property exempt from attachment in execution of a decree and the subject matter of the intended suit, to pay the court fee prescribed for the plaint. The Applicant's financial circumstances are as follows: 7. That a schedule of…

செயல்படுத்தல் பயன்பாடு

Case No. APPLICATION FOR IMPLEADMENT UNDER ORDER I, RULE 10, CPC Applicant: Respectfully submitted: 1. That is a necessary party to the above proceedings for the following reasons: . 2. That without being made a party, the present suit cannot be effectively and completely adjudicated. PRAYER It is prayed that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct that be impleaded as a party to the above proceedings. APPLICANT Date:

ஆட்சேபனை மனு

EXECUTION CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... DECREE HOLDER VERSUS ... JUDGMENT DEBTOR AND ... OBJECTOR OBJECTION PETITION UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 58 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Objector is not a party to the decree under execution, and has come to know that the property described below has been attached in the above execution proceedings. 2. THE PROPERTY ATTACHED 3. THE OBJECTOR'S RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST 4. That the said property, or the Objector's interest in it as set out above, does not belong to the Judgment Debtor, and is not liable to attachment or sale in satisfaction of the decree against the Judgment Debtor. 5. That the Objector holds the said property, or the said interest in it, in the Objector's own right, and not on behalf of or in trust for the Judgment Debtor. 6. DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON 7. That the attachment of the Objector's property in execution of a decree to which the Objector is not a party is wrongful and causes the Objector serious prejudice. 8. That this objection is filed promptly upon the Objector coming to know of…

இடமாற்ற மனு

TRANSFER PETITION NO. OF 20 Provision invoked: IN THE MATTER OF: ... PETITIONER VERSUS ... RESPONDENT PETITION SEEKING TRANSFER OF CASE NO. PENDING BEFORE TO MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That Case No. between the parties is pending before . 2. That is a court competent to try and dispose of the said case. 3. GROUNDS FOR TRANSFER The Petitioner seeks transfer of the said case on the following grounds: 4. That the Petitioner has not filed any other petition for transfer of the said case before this or any other court. 5. That this petition is made bona fide and in the interests of justice, and not to delay the proceedings in the said case. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (a) Transfer Case No. from to ; (b) Pending disposal of this petition, stay further proceedings in the said case before ; and (c) Pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper. AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY. Place: Date: PETITIONER Through ADVOCATE VERIFICATION I, , the Petitioner above named, do hereby…

மறுஆய்வு மனு

REVIEW PETITION NO. OF 20 IN CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... PETITIONER VERSUS ... RESPONDENT PETITION UNDER SECTION 114 READ WITH ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 SEEKING REVIEW MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That this Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass an order/decree dated in Case No. . A certified copy is filed with this petition. 2. SUBSTANCE OF THE ORDER 3. GROUNDS FOR REVIEW The Petitioner seeks review of the said order/decree on the following grounds: 4. That the Petitioner has not preferred any appeal against the said order/decree. 5. That this petition is filed on against the order/decree dated . 6. That this petition is made bona fide and in the interests of justice, and not with a view to re-argue the matter or to seek a fresh hearing on the merits. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (a) Review the order/decree dated passed in Case No. ; (b) Recall or modify the said order and pass such fresh order as this Hon'ble Court may deem just, after hearing the parties; (c) Stay the operation of the said…

மறுஆய்வு மனு

REVISION PETITION NO. OF 20 Provision invoked: IN THE MATTER OF: ... PETITIONER VERSUS ... RESPONDENT PETITION FOR REVISION OF THE ORDER PASSED BY IN CASE NO. MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Petitioner seeks revision of the order passed by in Case No. (the impugned order). A certified copy of the impugned order is filed with this petition. Date of the impugned order: 2. THE IMPUGNED ORDER 3. GROUNDS FOR REVISION The Petitioner submits that the impugned order calls for interference in revision for the following reasons: 4. That no appeal lies against the impugned order at the instance of the Petitioner. 5. That the impugned order is not an interlocutory order against which revision is barred by the provision invoked. 6. That the Petitioner has not filed any other revision against the impugned order before this or any other court. 7. That this petition is filed on . 8. That this petition is made bona fide and in the interests of justice. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (a) Call for the records of Case No. from ; (b) Set…

புகார் (சிவில் சூட்)

SUIT NO. OF 20 IN THE MATTER OF: ... PLAINTIFF VERSUS ... DEFENDANT PLAINT UNDER ORDER VII OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. PARTIES 1.1 The Plaintiff is a resident of the address stated above and is competent to institute the present suit. 1.2 The Defendant is a resident of / carries on business at the address stated above. 2. FACTS OF THE CASE 3. CAUSE OF ACTION 4. JURISDICTION This Hon'ble Court has both territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction to try and determine the present suit. 5. LIMITATION The present suit is filed within the period of limitation prescribed under the Limitation Act, 1963. 6. VALUATION AND COURT FEE The suit is valued at Rs. for the purposes of jurisdiction and court fee, and the requisite court fee has been paid thereon. 7. That the Plaintiff has not filed any other suit, petition or proceeding in respect of the same subject matter before this or any other court. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (a) Award the costs of the suit in favour of the Plaintiff; and (b) Pass…

தாமதத்தை கண்டனம் செய்வதற்கான விண்ணப்பம்

IN THE MATTER OF: ... APPLICANT VERSUS ... RESPONDENT APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Applicant is filing the accompanying proceeding before this Hon'ble Court, the contents of which may kindly be read as part of this application. 2. That there has been a delay of days in filing the said proceeding. 3. REASONS FOR THE DELAY The delay has occurred for the following reasons: 4. That the delay is neither wilful nor deliberate, nor is it attributable to any negligence, inaction or want of bona fides on the part of the Applicant. The Applicant has been prevented by sufficient cause within the meaning of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from filing within the prescribed period. 5. That the Applicant has acted with due diligence throughout, and approached this Hon'ble Court as soon as the circumstances causing the delay ceased to operate. 6. SUPPORTING MATERIAL 7. That the Applicant has a good case on the merits, and if the delay is not condoned the Applicant will suffer irreparable loss and be…

மறுசீரமைப்பு பயன்பாடு

MISC. APPLICATION NO. OF 20 IN CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... APPLICANT VERSUS ... RESPONDENT APPLICATION UNDER ORDER IX OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 FOR RESTORATION MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the above-numbered matter was listed before this Hon'ble Court on , and on that date the matter was dismissed for default / decided ex-parte in the absence of the Applicant. 2. REASON FOR NON-APPEARANCE The Applicant was unable to appear or be represented on the said date for the following reasons: 3. That the absence of the Applicant on the said date was neither intentional nor deliberate, nor did it arise from any negligence or want of bona fides. The Applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing. 4. That the Applicant remains keen to pursue the matter and to have it decided on the merits. 5. SUPPORTING MATERIAL 6. That the Applicant has a good and arguable case on the merits, and if the matter is not restored the Applicant will be gravely prejudiced and denied an adjudication on the merits. 7. That no prejudice will be caused to the Respondent by restoration of…

மேல்முறையீட்டு மனு

FIRST APPEAL NO. OF 20 (Arising out of the judgment and decree/order dated passed by the in Case No. ) IN THE MATTER OF: ... APPELLANT VERSUS ... RESPONDENT MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree/order dated passed by the in Case No. , and prefers the present appeal against it. A certified copy of the impugned judgment (and of the decree, where the rules of this Hon'ble Court require it) is filed with this appeal. 2. BRIEF FACTS 3. That the Appellant has not filed any other appeal, revision or proceeding against the impugned judgment and decree before this or any other court. 4. That the present appeal is filed within the period of limitation prescribed under the Limitation Act, 1963, after excluding the time taken to obtain a certified copy of the impugned judgment / is accompanied by an application for condonation of delay (strike out whichever does not apply). 5. Value of the appeal for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction: Rs. The…

சமரச மனு

CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... PLAINTIFF VERSUS ... DEFENDANT JOINT COMPROMISE PETITION UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the above-numbered matter is pending adjudication before this Hon'ble Court. 2. That the parties, with the intervention of well-wishers and common relatives/friends, and in order to maintain cordial relations and to avoid protracted litigation, have amicably settled all disputes and differences between them. 3. That the settlement has been arrived at voluntarily, out of the free will of both parties, without any coercion, force, fraud, misrepresentation or undue influence from any quarter, and after fully understanding its terms and consequences. 4. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT The parties have agreed as follows: 5. PAYMENT TERMS 6. That both parties agree that upon compliance with the terms recorded above, neither shall have any claim, demand or grievance of any nature against the other in respect of the subject matter of the present proceedings. 7. That both parties give up and relinquish all other claims…

மறுபிரவேசம்

CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... PLAINTIFF VERSUS ... DEFENDANT REJOINDER ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF TO THE WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANT MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the contents of the plaint may kindly be read as an integral part of this rejoinder and are not repeated here for the sake of brevity. Nothing stated in the written statement is admitted unless specifically admitted herein. 2. That the averments in the written statement that are contrary to or inconsistent with the plaint are denied, for the reasons set out below. REPLY TO PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS The Plaintiff submits that the preliminary objections raised by the Defendant are not sustainable, for the reasons stated in this rejoinder, and are liable to be rejected. PARAGRAPH-WISE REPLY Save as expressly and specifically admitted herein, EVERY averment, allegation and contention contained in the written statement is DENIED as if the same were set out and traversed seriatim. ADDITIONAL SUBMISSIONS A. That any allegation of fact in the plaint that the Defendant has not denied specifically or by necessary…

அவமதிப்பு மனு

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. OF 20 IN CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... PETITIONER VERSUS ... ALLEGED CONTEMNOR PETITION UNDER THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 FOR INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That this Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass an order dated in Case No. . A certified copy of the said order is filed with this petition. 2. DIRECTIONS CONTAINED IN THE ORDER The said order directed as follows: 3. That the alleged contemnor had knowledge of the said order and of the directions contained in it. Particulars of service or communication of the order: 4. DISOBEDIENCE 5. That the disobedience of the alleged contemnor is WILFUL and DELIBERATE. The alleged contemnor was fully aware of the order, was in a position to comply with it, and has without any lawful justification failed and neglected to do so. 6. That the conduct of the alleged contemnor amounts to civil contempt within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, being wilful disobedience of an order of this Hon'ble Court. 7. That the alleged contemnor's conduct has the…

எழுத்து மனு

(EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 20 IN THE MATTER OF: ... PETITIONER VERSUS ... RESPONDENTS PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO, THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE NAMED MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the Petitioner, whose particulars are stated above, is aggrieved by the impugned action described below and is entitled to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. That the Respondents are "State" or instrumentalities of the State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India, or are authorities or bodies discharging public functions or public duties, and are amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court. 3. FACTS OF THE CASE 4. THE IMPUGNED ACTION 5. GROUNDS 6. That each of the grounds above is taken without prejudice to the others, and the Petitioner craves leave to urge such additional grounds at the hearing as may be advised. 7. ALTERNATIVE REMEDY The Petitioner…

மனுக்களைத் திருத்துவதற்கான விண்ணப்பம்

I.A. NO. OF 20 IN CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... / APPLICANT VERSUS ... OPPOSITE PARTY APPLICATION UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 SEEKING LEAVE TO AMEND THE PLEADINGS MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the above-numbered matter is pending before this Hon'ble Court. The present stage of the proceedings is: 2. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS The Applicant seeks leave to amend the pleadings as follows: 3. REASON FOR THE AMENDMENT 4. That the proposed amendment is necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties, and without it the true controversy cannot be effectually adjudicated. 5. That the amendment sought does not change the nature and character of the case, nor does it introduce an entirely new or inconsistent case. It merely clarifies and elaborates what is already pleaded. 6. That the amendment does not withdraw any admission made by the Applicant, nor does it seek to take away any right that has accrued to the opposite party. 7. That the Applicant has acted with due diligence. The facts sought to be introduced…

ஆவணங்களை சமர்ப்பிப்பதற்கான விண்ணப்பம்

I.A. NO. OF 20 IN CASE NO. IN THE MATTER OF: ... APPLICANT VERSUS ... OPPOSITE PARTY APPLICATION SEEKING A DIRECTION FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the above-numbered matter is pending adjudication before this Hon'ble Court. 2. DOCUMENTS SOUGHT The Applicant seeks a direction for the production of the following documents, which are in the possession, custody or power of the opposite party: 3. RELEVANCE AND NECESSITY Each of the documents sought is directly relevant to the matters in issue, and is necessary either for disposing fairly of the proceedings or for saving costs. 4. That the documents sought are specifically described and identified. This application is not in the nature of a roving or fishing enquiry, and does not seek general discovery of an unspecified class of documents. 5. EFFORTS ALREADY MADE The documents have not been made available to the Applicant, and the Applicant has no means of obtaining them other than through an order of this Hon'ble Court. 6. That the documents are in the possession, custody or power of the opposite party,…